This study examines the role of coercion in the unification of the Hawai’ian Islands by Kamehameha I between 1782 and 1812 at a time of increasing European contact. Three inter-related themes in Hawaiian political evolution are examined: the balance between coercion and consent; the balance between general structural trends, and specific individual styles of leadership and historical events; and the balance between indigenous and European factors. The resulting synthesis is a radical reinterpretation of Hawaiian warfare that treats it as an evolving process heavily imbued with cultural meaning. Hawai’ian history is also shown to be characterised by fluid changing circumstances, including crucial turning points when options were adopted that took elements of Hawai’ian society on paths of development that proved decisive for political unification. These watershed moments were neither inevitable or predictable. Perhaps the greatest omission in the standard discourse on the political evolution of Hawai’ian society is the almost total exclusion of modern indigenous Hawai’ian scholarship on this topic. Modern historians from the Hawai’inuiākea School of Hawai’ian Knowledge at the University of Hawai’i at Mānoa argue that political leadership and socioeconomic organisation were much more consensus-based than is usually allowed for. Above all, this study finds modern indigenous Hawaiian studies a much better fit with the historical evidence than more conventional scholarship.